The framers of the Constitution did a lot for us. We have come a long way from when the Constitution was first drafted and we sometimes wonder what would they think about how we run things. Americans have debated the Constitution since the day it was signed. This past decade has been a long national civics class about what the Constitution means and how much it still matters. The rise of the Tea Party has made us focus more on the Constitution lately. As more and more people try to break down this document, the more and more we realize how conflicting it is. The framers weren't afraid of a little messiness, they knew it wasn't perfect which is where we come in and are able to change it.
The Constitution gives the President the privilege of being commander in chief, but also gives Congress the power to declare war. The Constitution also gives Congress the right to borrow money and tax. Many people suggest that the U.S. not raising the debt ceiling and defaulting would be a lesson to the government not to borrow more than it can repay. Defaulting on our debt is unconstitutional because we are unable to get out of our obligations. If Congress really wants to default the President can reject it by calling it unconstitutional and perform excessive, unnecessary actions to bind us in contracts and it would be constitutional. As one can see, alot is going on within the gov't either because someone is misinterpreting the Constitution or simply because the Constitution is conflicting within itself.
The Constitution gives the President the privilege of being commander in chief, but also gives Congress the power to declare war. The Constitution also gives Congress the right to borrow money and tax. Many people suggest that the U.S. not raising the debt ceiling and defaulting would be a lesson to the government not to borrow more than it can repay. Defaulting on our debt is unconstitutional because we are unable to get out of our obligations. If Congress really wants to default the President can reject it by calling it unconstitutional and perform excessive, unnecessary actions to bind us in contracts and it would be constitutional. As one can see, alot is going on within the gov't either because someone is misinterpreting the Constitution or simply because the Constitution is conflicting within itself.
INTRO:
1. Which group does Stengel claim has refocused America's attention on the Constitution?
the Tea Party
2. How does he define "constitutional originalists"?
3. What does Texas Congressman Ron Paul say the intent of the Constitution is, and how does Stengel counter this statement?
LIBYA:
4. What does the War Powers Resolution do?
5. Why does Barack Obama think this does not apply to the situation in Libya?
6. How does Stengel explain the War Powers Resolution as a check and balance?
7. Does Congress want to be in charge of committing troops? Why or why not?
No, they just dont want the President to do so with excessive force.They know that he is the Commander in Chief but the Constitution is in conflict with itsself.
DEBT CEILING:
8. Why would defaulting on our debt have been unconstitutional?
9. How does the argument over the debt limit usually play out?
OBAMACARE:
10. Why has one district judge declared Obama's Health Care plan unconstitutional?
11. Which congressional power allows the government to require us to purchase things?
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3
12. Why does Stengel argue that citizens should be required to buy insurance?
IMMIGRATION:
13. What does the principle of jus soli mean?
14. What part of the constitution makes the US a jus soli nation?
The 14th Amendment
15. What was the original intent of this part of the constitution?
16. What is the difference between a constitution and a code of laws?
No comments:
Post a Comment