Obama & Environmentalists

 President Obama has had a rocky relationship with environmentalists over the past couple of years he has seemingly favored the oil and gas industry and business leaders. When industry critics warned that a new air-quality rule would cost millions of jobs, the president asked the EPA to delay action and rewrite the rule. Weeks later, the EPA announced that it would miss a deadline for another effort to combat global warming. Obama doesnt want to jeopardize reelection, so most of his decisions have been made carefully. These decisions, however, continue to anger environmentalists.

Obama has done much to patch things up with environmentalists, public health advocates and liberal groups. Environmental leaders say the president’s decision to block the pipeline project demonstrated that Obama was finally listening to them. But of course, him listening to one side angers the other side. Oil industry executives and Republican presidential candidates say he is jeopardizing a project that could add tens of thousands of “shovel ready” jobs to the economy. Obama is trying to please everyone with his new budget proposal.

1. Why would Obama side with companies instead of environmentalists?

 do what the environmentalists want would cost millions of jobs

2. What announcement did Obama make during his State of the Union that upset environmentalists?

 he vowed to open more than 75 percent of potential offshore oil and gas resources to exploration.

3. What has Obama done to please environmentalists?

 Implementing new rules that will double automobile fuel  efficiency by 2025

4. What does Obama's budget include that will upset environmentalists?

Cuts in the EPA's budget,especially funds for Super Fund toxic waste cleanups, and a revolving fund to maintain states’ water pipelines, purification facilities and vital waterways

5. What does Obama's budget include that will make environmentalists happy?

a proposal to spend $6.7 billion on clean and renewable energy projects

6. What is a cap and trade program? (you'll have to look it up)

 a program that establishes a cap throughout an economy on emissions of a substance considered a pollutant

7. Why would spending increases for the Department of Energy Efficiency be a better form of spending than EPA enforcement of current rules?

The increase would encourage the construction of more energy efficient commercial buildings, and would support the Interior Department’s program of allowing new renewable energy projects on public land.

Inflation

 People are scared of the word inflation. But inflation is one of the easiest ways to help the economy even though it might not be the best solution. Credit shocks are the reasons that recoveries after crises are slow.

Banks stop making loans in order to heal. Consumers use extra cash to pay down debts. And governments end up in a gridlock, because no one knows who to blame. But two very educated professors, one from the University of Wisconsin-Madison and the other from Harvard, think that the solution is higher prices.

There are some benefits to inflation. Inflation would shrink the value of the debts both the government and borrowers have to pay. Higher salaries would also make it easier for borrowers to pay back their loans helping banks. Inflation pushes people and companies to spend money. Also, increasing inflation could stimulate the economy, as well as lower our debts.

1. Why is it bad for the economy for consumers to save or pay down debts?

 the value of the dollar is decreasing and people use the little extra cash that they have to pay down debts

2. How would inflation help people pay off debts?

 inflation would shrink the value of debts

3. How can inflation stimulate spending?

 If you know prices are going to drop or stay flat, then you will delay a purchase. likewise, if you know prices are going to rise, then you will spend your money now.

4. The author argues the Fed should allow inflation to increase, how can they do this?

 higher gas prices and raise the inflation target to 6%

5. Why does the former Fed Chairman warn against using inflation as a tool to help the economy?

 the benefits of inflation last temporarily but the effects of higher prices last a long time

6. What alternative does he suggest? What would that end up causing?

institute a delayed consumption tax, prices would go up

7. What would be a positive impact of a national sales tax?

 it could boost demand in the same way as inflation

8. What would be a negative impact of a national sales tax?

 the fear of it would make things more expensive

9. What does the author mean when he says "It's something the Fed could do on its own, and get done now"?

 the job of the Fed is to regulate the money in circulation, so they can just increase the money in circulation themselves as early as tomorrow

Spending and Infrastructure

Republicans brought up a highway spending bill. This bill consisted of attempting to bring the Keystone XL Pipeline back from the grave, stopping funding for Amtrak, and tried to expand off shore drilling. This bill would never become a law mainly because the Democrats are against off shore drilling. But this bill also spotlights a major issue. America's old system for funding its highways is going downhill, and no politicians know exactly how to fix it.

Since FDR, the federal government has maintained a Highway Trust Fund which is paid for mostly by taxes on fuel, that helps ay for the construction of our roads. It originally was a good idea to make drivers have to pay at least something for the roads that THEY use. But the gas tax rate hasnt increased since '93 and inflation diminishes the value of the dollars that once were enough to pay for this. The problem is.....cars are becoming more and more fuel efficient. Thats definitely a good thing. Thats what we want, but Congress doesnt like this. More efficient cars means that you have to buy less gas. Less gas purchased means that these roads wont get paid for. No one is offering a good idea as to how we can make up for this loss of money.

1. Why won't the Republican sponsored bill at the beginning of the article ever actually become law?

 it attempts to expand off shore drilling and Democrats arent going for that in the Senate

2. What is the Highway Trust Fund?

 a fund that helps cover the repair and construction of our country's roads, bridges, and mass transit that is paid for mainly by taxes on fuel

3. What does the article mean when it says "inflation has eaten away a third of its value"?

 the gas tax has remained the same since '93. the cost of everything else has increased which makes the dollar less valuable meaning what was a lot then...is barely anything now

4. How is it actually both a good and bad thing for Congress that Americans have consumed less gasoline?

 good: more fuel efficient cars are emerging bad: less money is flowing into the highway trust fund

5. Explain what Exhibit 2.19 shows us.

 assuming that average gas mileage for cars and light trucks would rise to 31 and 45 MPG the real value of the trust fund would eventually to drop by as much as 40%

6. Explain what Exhibit 2.21 shows us.

 how much money the fund would need to maintain its purchasing power in 2008 dollars.

7. How have the Obama Administration's new gasoline consumption standards created new challenges for Congress?

 he wants to increase the mpg even more, which would result in less gas consumption

8. What are potential solutions to the problem?

 moving to a system that charges drivers based on the number of miles driven, rather than the gas they burn

Moderate Reaction to both Articles

Sullivan and Frum have two completely different views on how Obama has been doing and what his critics think of him. Tomasky agrees more with Sullivan. He thinks that Mitt Romneys attacks on Obama are crazy and just off the wall. Frum thinks that Obama is patiently building some kind of Leviathan state that will swallow initiative and crush freedom. Tomasky thinks that he is exaggerating juuuust a little bit. He believes that Obama is just a Keynesian at heart. There is something, however, that Tomasky doesnt like about Obama.

Obama has this tactic known as a long game. This is when you just plan ahead for the long run and whatever happens in between happens. Tomasky wishes tha Obama had more of a short game because Obama misses a lot of opportunities by just waiting around. He doesnt think that this is good leadership. If Obama wins reelection, he needs to develop a short game because he will only have four years to do a lot of things.

1. EXPLAIN why he agrees with Sullivan's critiques of Obama's critics.

 most of the president’s prominent critics on the right say pretty precisely the silly and content-free things that Andrew accuses them of saying and Romney attacks on Obama are just ridiculous

2. What does Tomasky think of Frum's criticisms of Obama?
  he thinks that he is exaggerating

3. EXPLAIN Tomasky's criticism of Obama's long game vs short game.
 he wishes that he had more of a short game in the past three years, he says that he gets so obsessed with being right in the long run that he misses a lot of opportunities

4. Which criticism of Obama by liberals does Tomasky say Sullivan has ignored?
 that despite Obamas MANY accomplishments, he could have done more if he wasnt afraid to go at it with the Republicans like when he left those Fed seats empty

5. Summarize Tomasky's critique of Obama's leadership style.
 he thinks that it is the complete opposite of leadership. he isnt really taking a stand he just sits back and let others do what they do, hoping that in the long run he will win

6. What challenges does Tomasky see facing Obama if he wins a second term? 

 the Republicans have out-negotiated him. He will only have four years to get a lot done and the stakes are very high

Bureaucracy & Courts

In 2007, a couple started to fill in land that they had just purchased with dirt and rocks. They had plans to build a new house on the land, but the Sacketts later received a notice from the EPA. The notice said that they were in violation of the Clean Water Act. Fines were dropped on the. Fines that they could not even dream about paying. The couple tried to challenge the EPAs allegations, but they were unsuccessful.

Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito both pointed out the problems that the property owners were faced with to General Malcom Steward. The General had no responses to the "what would you do if?" questions. This case has also attracted the attention of many environmental agencies. Some people argued that the couple was irresponsible because they didnt take the time to check with the EPA. A ruling will likely be held in June.

1. Who is the plaintiff?

 Sackett

2. Do they have standing to sue? Why?

 yes, they are the party that is directly affected

3. What is a compliance order?

 the order that the EPA sent them saying they have to do something or else

4. In this case, what does the plaintiff stand to lose if they lose the case?

 they will lose everything

5. How does this issue provide an example of "red tape"?

 a federal agency regulating something that prevents one from doing something

6. How is the Court expected to rule?

 in fovor of the Sacketts

7. Why is this case being heard at the Supreme Court?

 it got appealed

8. What would the National Resources Defense Council be an example of, and how might they be involved in the case?

 it is an environmental group and they are moree than likely thinking the same thing as theEPA

9. How does the compliance order potentially violate the couple's due process?

 they were non reviewable

10. What is the central issue of this case? (it's not about whether or not these people can build their house).

 whether EPA's use of non-reviewable compliance orders violates the Sacketts' right to due process of law.

11. What is the Clean Water Act?

 a federal law in the United States governing water pollution.

12. What does the lawyer for the EPA say the couple should have done?

 they should have checked in with the EPA

13. Why do people hate the bureaucracy?

 ppl think that they make all these unnecessary rules

Obama's critics are right

 The Obama administration is dragging America to the wrong future. One that we have less freedom, higher taxes, and bureaucracies will control us in. More and more people are filing for disability as a result of the lack of work. This is pulling us to becoming a welfare state. We also are losing a good amount of money in the process. If Obama is reelected, the federal government will spend more and more of the national income.

Obama is the only president since LBJ to push for a bigger government. His energy policy is all wrong too. Rather than just raise the prioce of oil to deter people from using it, he attempts to influence us by brute force. He is using this same brute force in health care too. basically, Obama has disappointed everybody  especially those who really needed him. It would be foolish to reelect someone who isnt up for the task.

1. How does Frum argue that Obama is creating a welfare state?

 more and more people are claiming disability become the jobs are scarce and they need help

2. How does this create a snowball effect within the federal government?

 they lose alot of money and the courts need more judges to process these cases and more and more people are granted disability

3. How does Frum argue that Obama is tampering with the market rather than using economic incentives to change behaviors of consumers?

 rather than increase the price of oil, which will make less people want to use it, he is using brute force

4. How does Frum characterize "Obamacare" differently than Sullivan did?

 he says that Obama is using this to try to make health care come w/o market competition

5. How was the situation in Britain in the 1990s similar to what Obama is doing to America now?

 Blair and his successor Brown used rapidly rising government revenues to finance new public-sector jobs in depressed old industrial areas.

6. How should Obama have handled the economic stimulus in response to the recession of 2008?

 he shouldn't have deferred as many Congress wishlists and made wiser decisons. the ones that he did make had nothing to do with the economy...they were good ideas though

7. Obama does not control what the Federal Reserve does, but how has he influenced it?

  he nominates the members

8. What will Obama's biggest foreign policy issue be in the coming election year?

 saving the euro

Obama's Critics are Wrong

 Everyone claims that they are disappointed with the President. He is getting attacked from everywhere. The attacks are wrong. The people that are attacking him are failing to realize what he has actually accomplished. They are really just being petty. The right side is getting upset because the stimulus package didnt work fast enough and the left side is upset that he constantly sucks up to Wall Street.

Obama has actually accomplished alot more than people actually give him credit for. People just dont realize his strategy. He plans for the future but no one notices that. This was expected though....presidents in their first term are always attacked mercilessly. But in just the first term, Obama has done much more beneficial things than the Bush administration accomplished in 8 years.

 

1. What does Sullivan say about presidents in the last year of their first terms?

 he will always get attacked mercilessly by his partisan opponents, and also, often, by the feistier members of his base.

2. What are the main criticisms of Obama from the right?

  He has governed more as a radical leftist and he is trying to change the American way of life and that he is a socialist

3. What was America's economic situation when Obama assumed office?

 the United States was losing around 750,000 jobs a month and there was a real chance of a systemic collapse of the entire global financial system, and unemployment and debt—lagging indicators—were about to soar even further

4. How have Obama's responses to the problem been interpreted by the right?

 they think that the stimulus plan was a fail because it didnt work fast enough and in the first year of his term, unemployment peaked

5. What typical Republican stances has Obama taken while in office?

 he has been far more fiscally conservative than his predecessor

6. In what ways is "Obamacare" a pretty conservative reform of the health care system?

 this will let 44 million free riders benefit from this

7. Why is the left wrong to be disappointed in Obama's performance so far?

  a depression was dodged, the bail out of the auto industry was successful, the Iraq war was ended, and the banks have been repaid

8. How is Obama communicating his accomplishments to the public?

 he shows them by his actions. show-dont-tell

9. How does Sullivan characterize Obama's pattern of responses to problems?

 Obama was always planning for eight years, not four

10. When does Sullivan concede that Obama has made mistakes in office?

 he has waged a war based on a reading of executive power that many civil libertarians oppose. And he has signed into law the indefinite detention of U.S. citizens without trial

Obama - State of the Union - 01.24.12

First off, I'll tell what i liked about his speech. The main thing that jumped out to me was his style. I liked how he singled out just random ordinary people based on their good deeds. He made it seem as if we know him on a personal level. Its good to know that our president, one of the most powerful men in the world, has enough time to single out typical Americans because of an injustice that was served to them and their ability to perservere.

Obama plans to do alot if he is reelected. His main priority, it seems, is to restore an economy where everyone gets a fair shot. He also wants to create more jobs of course. But he wants us to stay at home. What I mean by this is, that Obama wants the people that we educate, the things that we buy, and the things that we make, should stay here in America. He wants to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding companies that create jobs right here in America. He plans to lower tuition and reward teachers who are doing good jobs. One that that I'm sure pissed rich people off was when he said that if you make over 1 million a year then there is no way that you should be paying less than 30% in taxes.

Obama didnt directly slander republicans, but he did say some things targeted to them. He made sure to talk about cutting taxes for the people that make under $250,000 and raising them for people that make over $1,000,000. He plans to create more jobs and expand the gov't. Both of which the Republicans are against. Obama stated that he wanted to reward businesses that only sold their goods in America. I believe that this will anger Republicans as well because that will hurt their businesses.

Obama & the Bureaucratic Agencies

 President Obama announced that he has a new campaign to shrink the size of the federal gov't. He has asked Congress for this power. If he is given the power to do so, he plans on cutting down alot of the small business agencies and just cutting them down to one agency that would replace the Commerce Department.

The White House estimated that the consolidation would save $3 billion over 10 years but will result in reductions of 1,000 to 2,000 jobs. Obama wants to cut wasteful spending in doing this. He argues that no private business owner would want to spend all this money to keep up all of small business when they can just spend money on one business.

1. What is Obama asking of Congress?
 He is asking for powers to trim the gov't

2. What type of bureaucratic agencies is Obama planning to merge?
the Small Business Administration and five other trade and business agencies into a single agency so it can replace the Commerce Department.

3. How does Obama compare the federal bureaucracy to a private business?
he says that "no business or nonprofit leader would allow this kind of duplication or unnecessary complexity in their operations" and that they wouldn't let that happen for their business..so why is it ok for it to be done to the gov't

4. Which party would typically have the goal of cutting government?
 Republican

5. What do observers say about these types of cuts?
it will cut aloooooooot of jobs

6. Why is Obama pursuing Republican goals now?
Its almost time for reelection

7. Why aren't they likely to pass?
Most of the gov't is made up of Republicans and they dont want to do anything that Obama wants

8. How will this probably impact public opinion?

it depends on who argues the best, that winner will be able to get the public to stand by whatever they do

Iowa Caucus Results

 Mitt Romney beat Santorum by 8 votes. Santorum was a loser, but not completely. People will recognize his name from now on. That is sometimes the basis on who people will vote on. If all they hear is Santorum..Santorum...Santorum..then voters just might pick him. Romney has a full head of steam though. More than likely he will become the Republican candidate.

1. What is so special about the margin of victory?

 It was extremely close and showed how a real democracy should be

2. Who were the big winners in Iowa?

 Romney, Santorum, and Paul

3. Who were the big losers in Iowa?

Rick Perry and Michele Bachmann

4. What will these candidates likely do now?

 The losers will drop out and the winners will continue on to N.H.

5. How will Newt Gingrich change his campaign strategy after the results?

 He will campaign negatively

6. What was his approach to negative ads?

 He turned the other cheek

7. Based on the results, do you think negative ads are usually effective?

 Yes, thats just what Americans like. Someone else talking bad about another

8. What will happen in the next week?

 debates

9. What major advantages does Romney have in the next competition?

 Name recognition, confidence, and home-field

10. The article says primaries are "less volatile" than a caucus. What does that mean?

  ppl will remember a primary longer than they will the results from a caucus and they will actually have to prepare for it

11. How is South Carolina different from New Hampshire and Iowa for Republicans?

 SC is more Conservative

12. What groups did Ron Paul appeal to and how would that help him in a general election?

Democrats and young ppl

13. Based on the results, what do you think will happen as the Republican race continues? 

 Romney for pres.

Redistricting District 9

On Friday afternoon, the Speaker of the Senate released the details of statewide congressional redistricting. The 9th district now occupies the entire western two-thirds of the county, from north to south, which leaves the eastern third to the 8th District. The 7th District has seen its western border advanced all the way over to Hardeman County. In short, the Republicans are taking over.

 

1. How has Shelby County's congressional representation changed?

 Republicans have a better chance

2. How was the demographic makeup of the 9th district changed?

 it didnt really change...it is still solidly Democratic with the 60% African American majority but it now occupies the entire western two-thirds of the county

3. How would the 7th and 8th districts be impacted?

 they have gotten bigger

There were some new redistricting plans. Republicans are in control. Some people call it gerrymandering because they claim it is unfair, but Democrats have done it too. Its like a double sided coin...of course someone is going to lose....But anyway, Cohen is losing his Jewish constituents and he's pissed.

1. Why were Republicans able to control the redistricting process?

 they control both chambers of the legislature as well as the governorship

2. How does the article describe the practice of gerrymandering?

 it isnt new..the Democrats have done it too when they were in control

3. How does the 1965 Voting Rights Act affect the process?

the rights of minorities can not be not abridged or reduced in the determination of district lines.

4. How will District 9 be changed?

 it is moving farther north

5. Why is Cohen concerned about the changing demographics of District 9?

 he is jewish and they are separating him from the jews and he doubts that Fincher's rural perspective gives the 8th District congressman proper insight and perspective on behalf of the lost constituents.

6. Why is John Ryder drawing attention to the fact that Cohen represents a black district? (It's not because Cohen isn't black)

he was being sarcastic